Tokens?? Really?? Only in America!

It's been a little while since you had a dose of reality. I am working through some issues but I thought this was too important to let it slide.

Recently, some clown at the LA Times claimed that the numerous minorities featured at the Republican National Convention were merely "window dressing". Here is a link to the story, if you wish to bother : http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-white-party-20120828,0,7089439.story?track=rss

You know you are losing when you have to resort to this type of crap! I have a question for Horsey face; Who VOTED FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS THAT YOU CLAIM ARE JUST WINDOW DRESSING? Is it your contention that the GOP establishment had a demo rat moment and voted millions of times to get these people into office?? These "tokens" ran successful campaigns and won instead of doing what your boss Obama did; disgrace the other candidates into quitting. These "tokens" did something that you demo rat assholes despise: they succeeded WITHOUT THE PLANTATION MASTER'S HELP!! These "tokens" have the respect of the people they represent AND those of us that they don't represent. These "tokens" busted their asses to EARN respect while people like you sit on your asses and ABUSE token respect. This kind of "Window Dressing" sells houses, what people like you are selling is flushed down the toilet every day in those houses! That's my dose of reality for today!

Creator vs Creation

Hello, Friends! This is another dose of reality from yours truly. Enjoy!

I have been involved in two discussions on Twitter with Will Spencer. One discussion concerns gay rights; the other involves the rights of the federal government. My friend Mr. Spencer apparently doesn't understand that the underlying principles are the same for both discussions. Both relationships involve a creator and a creation!

Mr. Spencer has indicated that, in both situations, he believes the CREATION has the power to control the CREATOR. He believes that gays should have the RIGHT to get married and he believes that the FEDERAL government has authority over the states. I strongly disagree with both positions!

Concerning the gay issue, one MUST understand that we are “endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights”. Unless you were created by the government, THEY CAN'T GIVE YOU ANY RIGHTS!! Whether you choose to be gay or not is up to you but you were created by God! The One who created you has stated very clearly that your lifestyle is completely unacceptable to him. Why would you try to force your creator to bless what He has said is unholy? Satan did that! Turned out pretty good for him, huh?

Concerning the federal government, one MUST understand that the STATES created the federal government. That government was given specific LIMITED duties to perform. You can read what those duties are in the constitution but none of those duties include controlling the entity that created it! If Mr. Spencer did a little research, he would find some interesting things about state's rights: Before we the voters went to sleep and allowed such nonsense, congressmen worked for the state not the parties. If your senator or representative voted contrary to your state's wishes, you called him and told him to pack his bags. There was no argument. The party had no voice in who got nominated, the PEOPLE did. The states have the right, the authority AND THE DUTY to nullify anything coming from DC that negatively affects the people in that state!!

Both of these relationships are completely fouled up and upside down! The creator ALWAYS has authority over the creation!! Mr. Spencer has shown that he is willing to flip the two roles for the sake of convenience. Sorry but it can't work that way. Lucky for us, if we fix the relationship with OUR Creator, all the other creations will, by necessity, right themselves!!

Only Gays Need Apply!

Hello, people! Another dose of reality from yours truly. Tell me what you see wrong with the following article:

Tennessee Democrats disavow own Senate candidate, citing hate group ties

Published August 03, 2012

Associated Press

NASHVILLE, Tenn. –  The Tennessee Democratic Party is disavowing the winner of the party's nomination to challenge Republican Sen. Bob Corker in November, saying the little-known candidate belongs to an anti-gay hate group.

The winner of the seven-candidate Democratic primary, 35-year-old Mark Clayton, reported raising no money and campaigned little but received more than 48,000 votes. That's twice the number of his nearest competitor in Thursday's primary.

Clayton is vice president of the Falls Church, Va.-based Public Advocate of the United States, which calls itself a conservative advocacy group. The Southern Poverty Law Center calls the organization an anti-gay hate group.

Clayton did not immediately return messages. Public Advocate says on its website that it "offers strong and vocal opposition to," among other things, "same-sex marriage and the furtherance of so-called gay rights."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/03/tennessee-dems-disavow-own-senate-candidate-citing-hate-group-ties/#ixzz22fQUFHkY

Don't misunderstand me! I am happy to see these idiots fighting each other but do you understand the underlying meaning of what they are doing?  Here is a DEMOCRAT opposed to gay marriage and gay rights and the DEMOCRAT PARTY is saying they want nothing to do with him!! The DEMOCRAT voters in the city OVERWHELMINGLY chose this man knowing that he held these views and the DEMOCRAT PARTY is basically telling them to "sit down and shut up" "We know better than you what you want"

My dose of reality for today: In the democrat party, if you don't support gay rights, you can not represent us!