Tokens?? Really?? Only in America!

It's been a little while since you had a dose of reality. I am working through some issues but I thought this was too important to let it slide.

Recently, some clown at the LA Times claimed that the numerous minorities featured at the Republican National Convention were merely "window dressing". Here is a link to the story, if you wish to bother : http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-white-party-20120828,0,7089439.story?track=rss

You know you are losing when you have to resort to this type of crap! I have a question for Horsey face; Who VOTED FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS THAT YOU CLAIM ARE JUST WINDOW DRESSING? Is it your contention that the GOP establishment had a demo rat moment and voted millions of times to get these people into office?? These "tokens" ran successful campaigns and won instead of doing what your boss Obama did; disgrace the other candidates into quitting. These "tokens" did something that you demo rat assholes despise: they succeeded WITHOUT THE PLANTATION MASTER'S HELP!! These "tokens" have the respect of the people they represent AND those of us that they don't represent. These "tokens" busted their asses to EARN respect while people like you sit on your asses and ABUSE token respect. This kind of "Window Dressing" sells houses, what people like you are selling is flushed down the toilet every day in those houses! That's my dose of reality for today!

Creator vs Creation

Hello, Friends! This is another dose of reality from yours truly. Enjoy!

I have been involved in two discussions on Twitter with Will Spencer. One discussion concerns gay rights; the other involves the rights of the federal government. My friend Mr. Spencer apparently doesn't understand that the underlying principles are the same for both discussions. Both relationships involve a creator and a creation!

Mr. Spencer has indicated that, in both situations, he believes the CREATION has the power to control the CREATOR. He believes that gays should have the RIGHT to get married and he believes that the FEDERAL government has authority over the states. I strongly disagree with both positions!

Concerning the gay issue, one MUST understand that we are “endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights”. Unless you were created by the government, THEY CAN'T GIVE YOU ANY RIGHTS!! Whether you choose to be gay or not is up to you but you were created by God! The One who created you has stated very clearly that your lifestyle is completely unacceptable to him. Why would you try to force your creator to bless what He has said is unholy? Satan did that! Turned out pretty good for him, huh?

Concerning the federal government, one MUST understand that the STATES created the federal government. That government was given specific LIMITED duties to perform. You can read what those duties are in the constitution but none of those duties include controlling the entity that created it! If Mr. Spencer did a little research, he would find some interesting things about state's rights: Before we the voters went to sleep and allowed such nonsense, congressmen worked for the state not the parties. If your senator or representative voted contrary to your state's wishes, you called him and told him to pack his bags. There was no argument. The party had no voice in who got nominated, the PEOPLE did. The states have the right, the authority AND THE DUTY to nullify anything coming from DC that negatively affects the people in that state!!

Both of these relationships are completely fouled up and upside down! The creator ALWAYS has authority over the creation!! Mr. Spencer has shown that he is willing to flip the two roles for the sake of convenience. Sorry but it can't work that way. Lucky for us, if we fix the relationship with OUR Creator, all the other creations will, by necessity, right themselves!!

Only Gays Need Apply!

Hello, people! Another dose of reality from yours truly. Tell me what you see wrong with the following article:

Tennessee Democrats disavow own Senate candidate, citing hate group ties

Published August 03, 2012

Associated Press

NASHVILLE, Tenn. –  The Tennessee Democratic Party is disavowing the winner of the party's nomination to challenge Republican Sen. Bob Corker in November, saying the little-known candidate belongs to an anti-gay hate group.

The winner of the seven-candidate Democratic primary, 35-year-old Mark Clayton, reported raising no money and campaigned little but received more than 48,000 votes. That's twice the number of his nearest competitor in Thursday's primary.

Clayton is vice president of the Falls Church, Va.-based Public Advocate of the United States, which calls itself a conservative advocacy group. The Southern Poverty Law Center calls the organization an anti-gay hate group.

Clayton did not immediately return messages. Public Advocate says on its website that it "offers strong and vocal opposition to," among other things, "same-sex marriage and the furtherance of so-called gay rights."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/03/tennessee-dems-disavow-own-senate-candidate-citing-hate-group-ties/#ixzz22fQUFHkY

Don't misunderstand me! I am happy to see these idiots fighting each other but do you understand the underlying meaning of what they are doing?  Here is a DEMOCRAT opposed to gay marriage and gay rights and the DEMOCRAT PARTY is saying they want nothing to do with him!! The DEMOCRAT voters in the city OVERWHELMINGLY chose this man knowing that he held these views and the DEMOCRAT PARTY is basically telling them to "sit down and shut up" "We know better than you what you want"

My dose of reality for today: In the democrat party, if you don't support gay rights, you can not represent us!

Fallen Dynasty at Penn State

Looks like the NCAA has slapped Penn State University back to reality. For those of you not able to hear the news yet, Penn State has been hit with some heavy duty, pocket lightening penalties today. These sanctions were imposed because of the cover up of the Sandusky escapades:

1. $60 million dollars to set up a fund for abused children
2. Banned from College Bowl participation for the next four years
3. Number of scholarships reduced from 25 to 15 for the next four years
4. All football victories from 1998 to 2011 wiped away

For those not in the know, the 2nd and 3rd items really get into the pockets of the university!! There is quite a bit of money generated by the Bowl games and you can hardly rebuild your program when the number of scholarships is basically cut in half.

The 4th item might need some explaining to some people but I understand exactly what the NCAA did! 1998 is the year Sandusky was reported to have started pounding boys in the butt ON CAMPUS GROUNDS AND AT OTHER FOOTBALL FUNCTIONS. 2011 is when they finally did something about it.

Some people will play "Hero Worship" and ask why would you take victories away from Joe Paterno and the athletes that had nothing to do with it. My question to those people is this; Do you think the assistant coach ONLY told Paterno? How many of you could witness something like that and NOT tell your friends? I know I would have told more than one person! This sanction was levied because Paterno and, I believe, quite a few other people connected to the athletic department KNEW what was going on and did nothing about it for fear of damaging the reputation of the football program. As a result of their inaction, many more boys got their butts poked and their lives scarred forever. That deserves GREAT punishment!! 


The university is quite lucky that I was not the one deciding their punishment. The ENTIRE football program would have been abolished for thirteen years and a few more people would join Sandusky in prison. I am a very kind person but when you take advantage of young kids, boys or girls, I will strike you with lightning bolts if I can get my hands on them!! That's my dose of reality for the day!

Jesse Jackson, Jr. Exhausted! Really??

An article at TheHill.com has the headline "Questions mount over Jackson Jr's Absence". The democratic spin is that JJ has worked himself to exhaustion in the House of Representatives. REALLY?? What is he doing that the other 434 representatives are not doing? Why are they not so exhausted that they have to take medical leave until after the election?
The reality of the situation is that Jackson, Jr. is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for his involvement in the Blagoyevich fiasco. It has been rumored that he was throwing around "favors" to try to get the Senate seat vacated by Obama. Rather than admit the truth, democrats do what they do best; Spin, cheat, lie, repeat.
The other reality check from this story is that Rep. Luis Gutierrez and Sen. Dick Durbin have some things in common that are really interesting:

1. They are both Democrat
2. They both represent Illinois
3. They both voted AGAINST the contempt charges for Eric Holder
4. They are both DEMANDING that Jackson come forward with more details about his absence

The third and fourth items are the objects of the reality check. Here you have an Attorney General who has obviously been untruthful to Congress, the American people and, most importantly, the family of Brian Terry. Their attitude toward that is "Move along. There's nothing to see here". Another man misses a few days of work because he is under investigation......I mean exhausted, and it's "Katie, bar the door!! We have to get to the bottom of this!!" Really??

Saving Money by Closing Border Patrol Stations. Really??

Hello fellow conservatives! (Hopefully, a few liberals will sneak in and check things out) I have started this blog to give you my insight into some of the items making news. Let me dive right in.

It was announced today that the administration is closing eight border patrol stations on the US / Mexico border. Now, the first words out of the reporter's mouth after reading the headline were "This has nothing to do with the recent announcement concerning immigration enforcement". REALLY?? You announced a few days ago that you will not be enforcing any immigration laws but this move has nothing to do with that?? Just how stupid do they think we are? Why would you close these stations and reassign the agents working there FOUR MONTHS BEFORE THE ELECTION?? (Wouldn't have anything to do with the illegals voting democrat 98% of the time, would it?? Wonder if they would enforce immigration law on an illegal who said he would vote republican) Well, they answered that question. The claim is to save money!! Again, REALLY??

According to the report, this move will save a whopping one million dollars per year!!! Don't misunderstand me, one million dollars USED TO BE a lot of money. This administration currently spends SEVENTY EIGHT BILLION dollars a year for the food stamp program AND they continue to advertise to recruit more recipients. Many more billions are wasted by giving benefits to those who are here illegally, do not pay taxes into the system and, therefore, are not eligible to receive any benefits. Yet they want you to believe that saving one million a year is worth further opening our borders to illegals!! How about a little bit of reality, people!!